Liver disease and nutritional status are known to affect each other. When liver disease is severe, patients become more malnourished and have a worse prognosis. Adequate nutritional support for patients with liver diseases can improve a patient’s condition and prognosis. In acute liver failure, malnutrition is uncommon, and the disease prognosis is determined within a short time. Patients with acute liver failure may survive and recover if they receive a transplant. Considerations should be given to the management of glucose intolerance and hyperammonemia. However, well-designed clinical trials are still lacking until now. In the case of liver cirrhosis, malnutrition may occur due to a variety of causes, and as in other diseases, oral or enteral nutrition is preferred to parenteral nutrition. Even if esophageal varices are present, it is possible to install a feeding tube. However, in the presence of ascites, PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) becomes contraindicated due to risk of complications. Calorie intake of 30~35 Kcal/kg/day and protein intake of 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg/day are appropriate. Protein restriction should not be necessary unless hepatic encephalopathy is severe. Late evening snacking and intake of branched chain amino acids can be helpful.
Parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease (PNALD) is frequently observed in patients who require long-term parenteral nutrition. PNALD is diagnosed by clinical presentation, biochemical liver function test, long-term usage of parenteral nutrition, and negative workup for other liver diseases. Pathogenesis of PNALD is multifactorial and includes prematurity, nutritional excess, sepsis, and lack of enteral nutrition. Since PNALD was first reported more than 30 years ago, there have been various attempts to find effective treatments for PNALD. Cyclic parenteral nutrition and use of ω-3 polyunsaturated long-chain fatty acids (ω-3 PUFA) instead of ω-6 PUFA were reported worldwide as effective treatments. This article reviews the literature relating to PNALD.
Assessment of sequential changes in body composition during the metabolic response in critically ill surgical patients is essential for optimal nutritional support and management. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is an easy, portable, and quick way to assess body composition. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the sequential changes in body composition and the validity of Direct segmental Multi-frequency BIA in critically ill surgical patients.
Twenty-three patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after major surgery were measured for body composition by multiple-frequency BIA after intensive care unit admission as well as 3 and 7 days later. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to detect significant changes over time.
The average length of intensive care unit stay was 4.3 days. Total body water, extracellular water, skeletal muscle mass (SMM), soft lean mass, and fat-free mass (FFM) increased during the first 72 h of intensive care unit admission, after which they decreased slightly. On the other hand, fat mass decreased during the first 72 h of intensive care and then increased. However, arm circumference (AC), arm muscle circumference (AMC), and waist circumference (WC) gradually decreased by day 7 (P<0.001).
In this study, AC, AMC, WC, and direct segmental Multi-frequency BIA were less affected by initial resuscitation in the intensive care unit (ICU). Therefore, segmental BIA may be useful for critical ill patients in altered hydration states.