Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Validation of an Electronic Nutritional Risk Screening Tool for Hospital Cancer Patients
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition > Volume 3(1); 2012 > Article
Original Article Validation of an Electronic Nutritional Risk Screening Tool for Hospital Cancer Patients
Mi Ran Jung, M.D.1,2, Young Kyu Park, M.D., Ph.D.1,2, Eun Young Kim,1,3, Soo Jin Jang1,3

암 환자를 위해 개발된 전산화된 영양검색 도구의 타당성 검증
정미란1,2ㆍ박영규1,2ㆍ김은영1,3ㆍ장수진1,3
Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition 2012;3(1):16-22.
Published online: June 30, 2012
1Nutritional Support Team,
2Division of Gastroenterologic Surgery,
3Nutrition Team, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea

화순전남대학교병원 1영양집중지원팀,
2위장관외과,
3영양팀
Received: 18 May 2012   • Revised: 14 December 1901   • Accepted: 22 June 2012
prev next
  • 4 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Purpose: Although a number of validated nutritional risk screening tools are available, there is no gold standard for cancer patients, and most tools may not be applicable to the Korean population. To address this limitation, the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital developed an electronic nutritional risk screening tool for hospital cancer patients called the Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital?Nutritional Risk Screening Tool (CNUHH-NRST). This study assesses the validity of the CNUHH-NRST by comparing it with Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) and the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST).
Materials and Methods: A total of 529 cancer patients admitted in January 2010 were independently rated as not at risk or at risk of malnutrition by using the CNUHH-NRST, NRS 2002, and the MST. The cross-validity of the CNUHH-NRST was established, and secondary validation was conducted based on biochemical nutritional markers and clinical outcomes.
Results: The results indicate that 15.3%, 22.3%, and 16.6% of the patients were classified as at risk of malnutrition by the CNUHH-NRST, NRS 2002, and the MST, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the CNUHH-NRST relative to NRS 2002 and the MST were 66.1% and 99.3% and 70.5% and 95.7%, respectively. The kappa values were 0.74 and 0.68 (P<0.001). In comparison with the patients at no risk of malnutrition, those at risk showed lower serum albumin, total lymphocyte counts, and hemoglobin (P<0.05); a longer hospital stay (P<0.001); and higher mortality rates (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The CNUHH-NRST shows acceptable validity in comparison with NRS 2002 and the MST. In addition, the CNUHH-NRST can be used easily and quickly because it is an automated system based on electronic medical records. Further validation using a nutritional risk assessment tool is needed. (SMN 2012;3:16-22)


Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition
Close layer
TOP