Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Clin Nutr > Volume 1(1); 2007 > Article
Original Article Prevalence of Patients at Nutritional Risk among Those who Underwent Gastrointestinal Surgery for Cancer
Hosun Lee, RD.CNSD., Choong Bai Kim, M.D.1

위장관암 수술을 위해 입원한 환자에서 영양 검색 결과와 영양지원 처방의 적절성
이호선ㆍ김충배1
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007;1(1):23-27.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/jcn.2007.1.1.23
Published online: December 31, 2007
Department of Dietetics, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System,
1Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

세브란스병원 영양팀,
1연세대학교 의과대학 외과학교실
Received: 14 December 1901   • Revised: 14 December 1901   • Accepted: 14 December 1901
prev next
  • 13 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
prev next

Background
Undernutrition is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and is common encountered in patients admitted to hospital for gastrointestinal (GI) surgery. This study examined the prevalence of nutritional risk among those who had undergone GI surgery, and whether nutritional support was provided for patients at nutritional risk after surgery. Methods: This study prospectively studied 100 patients admitted to the Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System for elective GI surgery from September, 2006 to February, 2007. The NRS-2002 was used to evaluate the nutritional risk. The patients were characterized by scoring the components 'undernutrition' and 'severity of disease' into 4 categories (absent, mild, moderate or severe). The patient could have a score of 0∼3 for each component (undernutrition and severity of disease), and any patient with a total score ≥ 3 was considered to be at nutritional risk. Undernutrition was evaluated by 3 variables (BMI, recent weight loss, recent food intake). The primary physicians' order of nutrition support after surgery was recorded. Results: The mean age of the patients was 57.4±11.8 years. Sixty five cases were male and 30 were female. Of the 95 patients who underwent gastric or colon surgery, 47.4% were at nutritional risk. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups according to the site of surgery (46.8% of 62 gastric surgery patients vs. 48.5% of 33 colon surgery patients, P=0.67). Although 42.3% of patients at nutritional risk were not provided nu-trition support, 58.0% of patients not at nutritional risk were provided parenteral nutrition support after surgery. Conclusion: The introduction of a screening system for nutritional risk appears to be necessary for improving the nutritional status of GI surgical patient through a cost-effective nutrition therapy protocol. (JKSPEN 2007;1(1): 23-27)


Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Close layer
TOP