Abstract

Purpose
The effectiveness of enteral nutrition for patients with anastomotic leakage after gastric cancer surgery is controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare effectiveness between combined enteral nutrition with parenteral nutrition (EPN) and total parenteral nutrition (TPN).Methods: Patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery for primary gastric cancer from April 2010 to August 2012 were reviewed. Clinicopathologic characteristics, complication, laboratory tests, and body weight (Bwt) were compared between EPN and PN.Results: Among patients with postoperative leakage within postoperative 1 month (n=43), 13 patients were supported by EPN and 23 patients by TPN. Clinicopathologic characteristics, including preoperative Bwt, body mass index, nutritional status, other complications, and TNM stage were similar. Preoperative serum albumin and Bwt were similar between EPN and TPN. However, after 1 week of nutritional support, albumin at EPN was significantly higher than that of PN (3.52±0.3 and 3.25±0.3; P=0.010). Adjusted by preoperative Bwt, preoperative nutritional status, and difference in Bwt between preoperative and pre-nutritional support period, decrease of Bwt between pre-nutritional support and discharge was significantly less at EPN than at TPN (?4.5±5.4%and ?6.3±4.1%; P=0.001).Conclusion: In terms of the maintenance of serum albumin and Bwt during nutritional support, EPN may be a better supportive option than TPN for patients with anastomotic leakage after gastric cancer surgery.

• Keywords: Gastrectomy, Anastomotic leak, Enteral nutrition