Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

OPEN ACCESS

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Browse articles > Author index
Search
Chang Moo Kang 1 Article
Body composition assessment using bioelectrical impedance analysis and computed tomography in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in Korea: a before and after study
Juwan Kim, Seung-seob Kim, Ho Kyoung Hwang, Chang Moo Kang, Kyung Sik Kim, Sung Hyun Kim
Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2023;15(3):72-80.   Published online December 1, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.2023.15.3.72
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose: This study focuses on the need for standardized body composition measurements in the hepatobiliary-pancreatic field. It evaluates and compares the effectiveness of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and computed tomography (CT) scans in assessing body composition of patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), aiming to establish correlations among different body composition indexes.
Methods: Ninety-seven patients who underwent PD between August 2022 and March 2023, were enrolled in this study. Muscular and fatty parameters related to BIA and CT were assessed both preoperatively and on postoperative day 6. The correlation between each parameter related to muscle fat was analyzed according to the measurement modalities.
Results: There was an increase of skeletal muscle area (SMA), total muscle area, and low attenuated muscle area after surgery. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measured using BIA exhibited a strong correlation with the SMA and normal attenuated muscle area (NAMA) measured using CT (r=0.86, P<0.001; r=0.76, P<0.001). The trunk muscle measured using BIA demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with SMA and NAMA measured using CT (r=0.84 P<0.001; r=0.73, P<0.001). Body fat measured using BIA and total fat area (TFA) measured using CT showed strong correlations (r=0.74, P<0.001). In the postoperative analysis, a similar trend was observed (SMM vs. SMA: r=0.80, P<0.001; SMM vs. NAMA: r=0.70, P<0.001), (trunk muscle vs. SMA: r=0.79, P<0.001; trunk muscle vs. NAMA: r=0.69, P<0.001), and (body fat vs. TFA: r=0.83, P<0.001).
Conclusion: BIA, akin to CT, serves as a valuable tool for assessing body composition ratios in patients undergoing PD.
  • 10 View
  • 0 Download
Close layer

Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
Close layer
TOP