-
Perioperative nutritional management to improve long-term outcomes in critically ill perioperative organ transplant patients: a narrative review
-
Toshimi Kaido
-
Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2025;17(1):18-24. Published online April 1, 2025
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.25.0005
-
-
Abstract
PDF ePub
- Purpose
This review examines the significance of perioperative nutritional management in organ transplantation, with a particular focus on liver transplantation. Organ transplant recipients often experience malnutrition and sarcopenia due to nutritional and metabolic abnormalities associated with organ dysfunction. Because transplantation is a highly invasive procedure, optimizing perioperative nutritional care is critical for improving short-term outcomes and reducing postoperative infection-related mortality.
Current concept: Recent clinical investigations have shown that liver transplant recipients, who are frequently afflicted with end-stage liver disease and uncompensated cirrhosis, are particularly vulnerable to protein-energy malnutrition and secondary sarcopenia. Our analysis identified low pre-transplant nutritional status and the absence of preoperative branched-chain amino acid supplementation as independent risk factors for post-transplant sepsis. In response, we developed a customized nutritional therapy protocol that incorporates precise body composition analysis, serial measurements of biochemical markers (including prealbumin, zinc, and the branched-chain amino acid/tyrosine ratio), and targeted supplementation with branched-chain amino acids, zinc acetate, and synbiotics. Early initiation of enteral nutrition coupled with postoperative rehabilitative interventions resulted in improved outcomes. In addition, stratified body composition parameters correlated with survival differences and informed revised transplantation criteria.
Conclusion Tailored perioperative nutritional management and rehabilitative strategies are essential for improving early postoperative outcomes in liver transplantation. These findings underscore the need for proactive nutritional assessment and intervention, which may represent a breakthrough in transplant prognosis. Future research should refine nutritional protocols and integrate novel biomarkers, while education and interdisciplinary collaboration remain crucial for enhancing transplant outcomes and reducing complications.
-
Successful introduction of ERAS in pancreaticoduodenectomy: what is real minimally invasive surgery?
-
Toshimi Kaido, Yosuke Miyachi, Koichiro Mitsuoka, Mariko Sanbonmatsu
-
Published online June 27, 2025
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.25.0014
-
-
Abstract
ePub
- Purpose
The introduction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has been considered challenging due to factors such as preexisting malnutrition, sarcopenia, the complexity of the surgery, and the high incidence of postoperative complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). This study aimed to determine whether ERAS could be implemented in PD to achieve shorter postoperative hospital stays.
Methods Our novel approach consists of three components. Preoperatively, we routinely assess patients' muscle strength and nutritional status and initiate exercise and nutritional interventions for those identified with sarcopenia or malnutrition. Intraoperatively, we perform pancreaticojejunostomy using a modified Blumgart’s technique with our stent placement policy and utilize gastrojejunostomy methods to prevent DGE. Postoperatively, we emphasize early ambulation, early oral intake, and prompt drain removal. Since April 2020, we have employed this strategy and retrospectively evaluated its effectiveness. We enrolled 41 consecutive patients who underwent open PD with curative intent by January 2023. Various surgical outcomes, including postoperative hospital stay, were analyzed.
Results There were 26 men and 15 women, with a median age of 68 years (range, 40–84 years). Preoperative diagnoses included pancreatic head cancer (18 patients), distal bile duct cancer (10 patients), and others. Median intraoperative blood loss was 373 mL (range, 25–1,155 mL). Grade B POPF occurred in three patients (7%). No cases of DGE were observed. The median day of drain removal was postoperative day 3. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range, 6–26 days).
Conclusion We successfully implemented ERAS protocols in PD and achieved a significantly reduced postoperative hospital stay. We propose that this approach constitutes “real minimally invasive surgery,” independent of the specific surgical technique used.
|