Trace-elements play an important role in human metabolism. Often overlooked by clinicians, they are mandatory to supply for the patient with parenteral nutrition. When it is deficient or excessive, inadequate provision of trace elements can lead to serious complication. The nutrition provider should monitor deficiency and toxicity of each trace element carefully. In Korea, five trace elements (Zinc, Copper, Manganese, Chromium, and Selenium) are commercially available. However, according to the up to date recommendation, their dosages are not adequate for patients with long term parenteral nutrition. In this review, I considered the adequate dosage of each trace element under specific conditions, and provided a guideline for monitoring of trace elements.
Malnutrition has a significant impact on the recovery of patients. Assessment of nutritional status and appropriateness of nutritional support is of clinical importance. In the various nutritional assessment methods, biochemical markers (albumin, pre-albumin, retinol binding protein, and transferrin) are widely used for high sensitivity and objectivity. For application of the biochemical markers, it should be understood that the markers have merits and de-merits. Author investigates the retinol binding protein, one of the most sensitive biochemical markers, in more detail. Retinol binding protein (RBP) is synthesized in liver (mainly, parenchymal cells) and catalyzed in kidney. RBP transports retinol, alcohol form of vitamin A, from liver to tissue. Also, RBP and transthyretin (TTR, formerly called pre-albumin) form a macromolecular complex to prevent glomerular filtration of the low molecular weight RBP in the kidney. RBP is a very useful biochemical marker because it has short half-life and immediate response to deficiency or in support of calorie and protein. However, because serum RBP level is greatly affected by the liver and kidney function, understanding of the underlying disease of patients is necessary. Moreover, it is not widely used due to very short half-life and non-generalized measurement methods. Consequently, understanding the characteristics of RBP is necessary and effort should be made to properly utilize the RBP in nutrition support and assessment.
Citations
The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic assisted low anterior resection for colorectal cancer. The patients received either conventional perioperative care or the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) procedural care.
A retrospective review was conducted in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic low anterior resection for colorectal cancer between May, 2011 and December, 2013. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to the perioperative care program of ERAS and conventional care.
A total of 81 patients received care via the ERAS pathway and 230 patients received care via conventional pathway. There was no significant difference in postoperative morbidity rates (P=0.381). The post-operative morbidity rates were 30.9% and 25.2% in the ERAS and conventional groups. No significant difference in hospital stay (9.0±6.8 vs. 8.6±3.5 days; P=0.575) was observed between the 2 groups.
No short-term perioperative disadvantages were found for the ERAS program compared with the conventional perioperative care for colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection. (Surg Metab Nutr 2015;6:11-15)