Purpose: Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) requires data on changes in weight and the amount of oral intake with a certain level of accuracy, while information given by patients is often unclear and non-quantitative. The time interval between diagnosis and surgery is becoming shorter, and it is difficult to obtain objective confirmation about these changes from medical records before surgery. The aim of this study was to compare nutritional risks as estimated by NRS-2002 with nutritional status in patients with gastric cancer when data on changes in weight and the amount of oral intake were limited.
Materials and Methods: Only objectively confirmed data (body mass index, age) and severity of disease were used to estimate the nutritional risk of 277 patients by NRS-2002. The results were compared to nutritional status assessed by percent ideal body weight and serum albumin levels.
Results: Of 277 patients, 220 were classified as nutritionally not at risk by NRS-2002. Out of those 220 patients, 28 patients were malnourished and 192 patients were not malnourished. Only serum albumin levels were significantly different between malnourished and non-malnourished groups (P<0.001).
Conclusion: When data on changes in weight and the amount of oral intake are limited,patients with protein malnutrition are likely to be overlooked by NRS-2002. (SMN 2011;2:21-25)