Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-12.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Evaluating Total Parenteral Nutrition after Pylorus-preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD)
Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

OPEN ACCESS

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Clin Nutr > Volume 2(1); 2009 > Article
Original Article Evaluating Total Parenteral Nutrition after Pylorus-preserving Pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD)
Yun Hee Park, M.S.2, Sung Eun Kim, B.S., Jae Youn Kim, Ph.D., Young Cheon Song, Ph.D., Suk Kyung Hong, M.D.1

유문부-보존 췌장십이지장 절제 환자의 TPN 사용 현황 및 평가
박윤희2ㆍ김성은ㆍ김재연ㆍ송영천ㆍ홍석경1
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2009;2(1):1-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/jcn.2009.2.1.1
Published online: December 31, 2009
Departments of Pharmacy,
1Surgery,
2Nutrition Support Team, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 약제팀,
1외과,
2영양집중지원팀
Received: 14 December 1901   • Revised: 14 December 1901   • Accepted: 14 December 1901
next
  • 5 Views
  • 1 Download
  • 0 Crossref
  • 0 Scopus
next

Purpose
Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) is considered the treatment of choice for various periampullary diseases. Although patients who undergo PPPD require postoperative parental nutrition, no guideline has currently been established for this specific group. The aim of this study is to evaluate the TPN given to patients after PPPD and to identify a standard protocol for these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study that reviewed the patients in Asan Medical Center who had undergone PPPD and who had received TPN from January to December in 2007. TPN utilization was evaluated with assessing the supplemented calories and the duration of the TPN. The observed outcomes were the changes in the nutritional status of each patient, the morbidity, the mortality and the length of the hospital stay. Results: A total of 160 patients were enrolled in this study and of these, 118 patients were malnourished. The worse the preoperative nutritional status was for each patient, the longer the TPN was required and this was also true for the length of the hospital stay. The mean calories and protein values given through TPN were 35.15 kcal/kg and 1.39 g/kg, respectively. This was more excessive than the recommended levels (33.02 kcal/kg and 1.34 g/kg, respectively) when considering each patient's nutritional status. We classified the patients by the ratio of supplied calories to the recommended calories; the low-calories group (<90%; n=26), the adequate calories group (90∼110%; n=74) and high-calories (>110%; n=60) group. The duration of TPN (9.5d, 10.3d and 12.6d) and the length of the postoperative hospital stay (22.0d, 23.3d and 26.4d) were not statistically different between the groups. The rate of metabolic abnormalities and infectious complications were higher in the over-calories group (71.7% and 25%, respectively) when compared to that of the other two groups (67% and 14%, respectively). Major complications such as delayed gastric emptying, fistulae and anastomotic leakage were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: In this study, excessive calorie supplementation had no significant benefit on the outcome of patients after PPPD. Therefore, we suggest that an adequate amount of nutrition, with giving consideration for the pre-existing nutritional status, will be advantageous for the cost-benefit aspect. (KJPEN 2009;2(1):1-5)


Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Close layer
TOP