Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

Guidelines

A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part III. preparation of enteral nutrition formulas: In Seok Lee, Ye Rim Chang, Bo-Eun Kim, Youn Soo Cho, Sung-Sik Han, Eunjung Kim, Hyunjung Kim, Jae Hak Kim, Jeong Wook Kim, Sung Shin Kim, Eunhee Kong, Ja Kyung Min, Chi-Min Park, Jeongyun Park, Seungwan Ryu, Kyung Won Seo, Jung Mi Song, Minji Seok, Eun-Mi Seol, Jinhee Yoon, Jeong-Meen Seo, for the KSPEN Enteral Nutrition Committee; Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2026;18(1):3-9. Published online March 30, 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.26.0046

Abstract PDF: Purpose
This guideline was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the safe preparation and handling of enteral nutrition (EN) formulas in order to improve patient safety and promote standardized clinical practice in Korea.
Methods
The key questions addressed the selection of open versus closed feeding systems, the safe preparation and handling of EN formulas, precautions related to blenderized tube feeding (BTF), and essential labeling requirements. Recommendations were drafted and refined through multidisciplinary expert consensus under the auspices of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN).
Results
The choice of feeding system should be determined according to the patient’s condition, risk of infection, and anticipated duration of feeding. Closed feeding systems are recommended because they reduce contamination risk and nursing workload, whereas open feeding systems require strict adherence to aseptic technique. For open or reconstituted EN formulas, hang time at room temperature should not exceed 4 hours, whereas closed feeding systems should follow the manufacturer’s recommended hang time. For BTF, administration time should be limited to 2 hours to minimize bacterial growth, and their use is contraindicated in medically unstable or immunocompromised patients. Accurate labeling, including patient identifiers, formula information, administration route, and hang time, is essential to prevent administration errors.
Conclusion
These guidelines provide a practical framework for the safe preparation and management of EN formulas. Adherence to standardized preparation protocols, including appropriate feeding system selection and strict hygiene practices, is essential for reducing complications and improving the safety of EN therapy.

376 View
26 Download

A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part II. selection and initiation of enteral feeding routes: Ja Kyung Min, Ye Rim Chang, Bo-Eun Kim, In Seok Lee, Jung Mi Song, Hyunjung Kim, Jae Hak Kim, Kyung Won Seo, Sung Shin Kim, Chi-Min Park, Jeongyun Park, Eunjung Kim, Eunmi Sul, Sung-Sik Han, Jeong Wook Kim, Seungwan Ryu, Minji Seok, Jinhee Yoon, Eunhee Kong, Youn Soo Cho, Jeong Meen Seo, for KSPEN Enteral Nutrition Committee; Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2025;17(3):165-171. Published online December 1, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.25.0037

Abstract PDF: Purpose
We developed evidence-based recommendations for selecting and initiating the enteral nutrition (EN) delivery route in adult and pediatric patients to improve safety and standardize practice in Korea.
Methods
Key questions covered feeding tube selection, methods to verify tube placement, confirmation in pediatric patients, and timing of EN following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Recommendations were drafted and refined through multidisciplinary expert consensus under the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN).
Results
Feeding tube selection should be based on gastrointestinal anatomy, function, and expected EN duration. Short-term feeding is recommended with nasogastric or orogastric tubes, whereas long-term feeding should use percutaneous or surgical routes such as PEG. Tube position must always be verified before use, preferably with radiography or pH testing; auscultation alone is unreliable and should not be used. In pediatric patients, radiographic confirmation remains the gold standard, although pH testing and insertion-length assessment may be considered when imaging is not feasible. After PEG, EN can be initiated safely within 4 hours in both adults and children without increasing complications if trained staff monitor for leakage or infection.
Conclusion
This guideline offers a structured framework for safe and timely EN tailored to patient characteristics. Early verification and multidisciplinary collaboration help reduce complication, improving outcomes of EN therapy.

1,272 View
76 Download

Original Article

Evaluation of the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score in Korean critically ill patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study: Won Ho Han, Jong-Mog Lee, Jae Hoon Lee, Hyun Mi Lee, Ji-Yeon Kim, Mok Young Jang, Sung-Sik Han; Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2025;17(2):125-131. Published online August 1, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.25.0009

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
We evaluated the efficacy of the modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score for malnutrition screening and its association with mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19.
Methods
The nutritional status of 129 COVID-19 ICU patients admitted between February 2021 and May 2022 was assessed using American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition/Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (ASPEN/AND) criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, and clinical correlations of the mNUTRIC score were analyzed.
Results
Of the 129 patients, 35 (27.1%) met the ASPEN/AND malnutrition criteria. Multivariable analysis identified the mNUTRIC score, underlying malignancy, and mechanical ventilation as significant factors associated with malnutrition. The mNUTRIC score had a sensitivity of 77.1% and specificity of 63.8% (area under the curve [AUC], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62–0.79) for diagnosing malnutrition, improving to 88.6% and 80.9%, respectively, after adjusting for malignancy and ventilation (AUC, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.95). Patients with a low mNUTRIC score had a mortality rate of 2.9% and a median ICU stay of 7.7 days (range, 0–84.2 days), whereas those with a high score (≥5) had a mortality rate of 13.1% and a median ICU stay of 10.2 days (range, 1.4–88.5 days) (P=0.046 and P=0.011, respectively).
Conclusion
The mNUTRIC score is an effective screening tool for malnutrition in ICU patients with COVID-19, especially those with malignancy or requiring mechanical ventilation, and is strongly associated with mortality and length of ICU stay.

3,470 View
33 Download

Guideline

A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part I. prescribing enteral nutrition orders: Ye Rim Chang, Bo-Eun Kim, In Seok Lee, Youn Soo Cho, Sung-Sik Han, Eunjung Kim, Hyunjung Kim, Jae Hak Kim, Jeong Wook Kim, Sung Shin Kim, Eunhee Kong, Ja Kyung Min, Chi-Min Park, Jeongyun Park, Seungwan Ryu, Kyung Won Seo, Jung Mi Song, Minji Seok, Eun-Mi Seol, Jinhee Yoon, Jeong Meen Seo, for KSPEN Enteral Nutrition Committee; Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2025;17(1):3-8. Published online April 1, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.25.0002

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed to develop a comprehensive practical guide for enteral nutrition (EN) designed to enhance patient safety and reduce complications in Korea. Under the leadership of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN), the initiative sought to standardize EN procedures, improve decision-making, and promote effective multidisciplinary communication.
Methods
The KSPEN EN committee identified key questions related to EN practices and organized them into seven sections such as prescribing, delivery route selection, formula preparation, administration, and quality management. Twenty-one experts, selected based on their expertise, conducted a thorough literature review to formulate evidence-based recommendations. Drafts underwent peer review both within and across disciplines, with final revisions completed by the KSPEN Guideline Committee. The guide, which will be published in three installments, addresses critical elements of EN therapy and safety protocols.
Results
The practical guide recommends that EN orders include detailed elements and advocates the use of electronic medical records for communication. Standardized prescription forms and supplementary safety measures are outlined. Review frequency is adjusted according to patient condition—daily for critically ill or unstable patients and as dictated by institutional protocols for stable patients. Evidence indicates that adherence to these protocols reduces mortality, complications, and prescription errors.
Conclusion
The KSPEN practical guide offers a robust framework for the safe delivery of EN tailored to Korea’s healthcare context. It emphasizes standardized protocols and interdisciplinary collaboration to improve nutritional outcomes, patient safety, and operational efficiency. Rigorous implementation and monitoring of adherence are critical for its success.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Bridging evidence and clinical practice: a practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Suk-Kyung Hong
Ann Clin Nutr Metab.2025; 17(1): 1. CrossRef

7,924 View
213 Download
1 Crossref

Original Article

Nutritional Therapy Related Complications in Hospitalized Adult Patients: A Korean Multicenter Trial: Eun-Mi Seol, Kye Sook Kwon, Jeong Goo Kim, Jung-Tae Kim, Jihoon Kim, Sun-Mi Moon, Do Joong Park, Jung Hyun Park, Je Hoon Park, Ji Young Park, Jung-Min Bae, Seung Wan Ryu, Ji-Young Sul, Dong Woo Shin, Cheung Soo Shin, Byung Kyu Ahn, Soo Min Ahn, Hee Chul Yu, Gil Jae Lee, Sanghoon Lee, A Ran Lee, Jae Young Jang, Hyun Jeong Jeon, Sung Min Jung, Sung-Sik Han, Suk-Kyung Hong, Sun-Hwi Hwang, Yunhee Choi, Hyuk-Joon Lee; J Clin Nutr 2019;11(1):12-22. Published online June 30, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/jcn.2019.11.1.12

Abstract PDF

Purpose:

Nutritional therapy (NT), such as enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN), is essential for the malnourished patients. Although the complications related to NT has been well described, multicenter data on symptoms in the patients with receiving NT during hospitalization are still lacking.

Methods:

Nutrition support team (NST) consultations, on which NT-related complications were described, were collected retrospectively for one year. The inclusion criteria were patients who were (1) older than 18 years, (2) hospitalized, and (3) receiving EN or PN at the time of NST consultation. The patients’ demographics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI]), type of NT and type of complication were collected. To compare the severity of each complication, the intensive care unit (ICU) admission, hospital stay, and type of discharge were also collected.

Results:

A total of 14,600 NT-related complications were collected from 13,418 cases from 27 hospitals in Korea. The mean age and BMI were 65.4 years and 21.8 kg/m². The complications according to the type of NT, calorie deficiency (32.4%, n=1,229) and diarrhea (21.6%, n=820) were most common in EN. Similarly, calorie deficiency (56.8%, n=4,030) and GI problem except for diarrhea (8.6%, n=611) were most common in PN. Regarding the clinical outcomes, 18.7% (n=2,158) finally expired, 58.1% (n=7,027) were admitted to ICU, and the mean hospital days after NT-related complication were 31.3 days. Volume overload (odds ratio [OR]=3.48) and renal abnormality (OR=2.50) were closely associated with hospital death; hyperammonemia (OR=3.09) and renal abnormality (OR=2.77) were associated with ICU admission; “micronutrient and vitamin deficiency” (geometric mean [GM]=2.23) and volume overload (GM=1.61) were associated with a longer hospital stay.

Conclusion:

NT may induce or be associated with several complications, and some of them may seriously affect the patient’s outcome. NST personnel in each hospital should be aware of each problem during nutritional support.