KSPEN
KSSMN
ASSMN
Articles
- Page Path
- HOME > J Clin Nutr > Volume 13(1); 2021 > Article
- Original Article Impact of Visceral Fat Area Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis on Clinico-Pathologic Outcomes of Colorectal Surgery
-
Kyeong Eui Kim1,2
, Woo Jin Song1,2, Minji Seok3, Sung Uk Bae1,4, Woon Kyung Jeong1, Seong Kyu Baek1 - 생체 전기 임피던스 분석으로 측정한 내장 지방 단면적이 대장 수술의 임상병리학적 결과에 미치는 영향
-
김경의1,2, 송우진1,2, 석민지3, 배성욱1,4, 정운경1, 백성규1
-
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2021;13(1):17-23.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/jcn.2021.13.1.17
Published online: June 30, 2021
1Department of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
2Keimyung University Graduate School, Daegu, Korea
3Department of Nursing, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea
4Nutrition Support Team, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, Korea
- Correspondence to Sung Uk Bae https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-4196Department of Surgery, Keimyung University School of Medicine, 1035 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, KoreaTel: +82-53-258-4708, Fax: +82-53-258-4710, E-mail: sabiston0000@hanmail.net
• Received: June 24, 2021 • Accepted: June 26, 2021
Copyright © 2021 The Korean Society of Physical Therapy
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
- 3 Views
- 0 Download
Abstract
-
Purpose This study investigated the relationship between the visceral fat area (VFA) and clinico-pathological outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
-
Methods This retrospective study included 204 patients who underwent anthropometric measurement by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) before surgical treatment for CRC between January 2016 and June 2020.
-
Results According to the average value of the visceral fat area, 119 (58.3%) patients had a low visceral fat area, and 85 (59.1%) patients had a high visceral fat area. Patients with visceral obesity showed a higher BMI compared to patients without visceral obesity, (21.8±1.9 vs. 25.7±2.5, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the overall perioperative outcomes including total operation time, time to gas out, sips of water, soft diet, hospital stay, and morbidity between patients in the low and high VFA groups. We divided patients into two subgroups according to the degree of cancer progression and more advanced cases with low VFA showed significantly more total and positive retrieved lymph nodes (LNs) (20.9±10.3 vs. 16.1±7.1, P=0.021 and 3.3±2.9 vs. 2.2±2.3, P=0.019, respectively) and a higher proportion of more than 12 retrieved LNs compared to patients with a high VFA (95.1% vs. 90.0%, P=0.047). Body composition analysis showed that phase angle, muscle composition, and body fluid composition were not statistically different between the two groups. However, body fat mass was statistically higher in the high VFA group (22.0±4.6 vs. 12.8±3.1, P<0.001).
-
Conclusion Visceral obesity measured by BIA showed lower total and positive retrieved LNs and was not associated with adverse peri-operative outcomes, inflammatory and nutritional, and pathologic outcomes for CRC.
INTRODUCTION
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer and second most mortality in worldwide. Obesity is a global health growing problem. According to World Health Organization, 39% of adults aged 18 years and over were overweight, and 13% of adults were obese. The relationship between body weight and several cancers is now well recognized obesity is now a well-established risk factor for development of CRC and is also associated with increased mortality from CRC.1-3 In clinical setting, body mass index has been used to one of the most reliable anthropometric methods to check obesity, however it doesn’t reflect the accumulation of adipose tissue, especially intra-abdominal or visceral fat tissue.4,5
Some studies showed that increase of visceral fat was associated with post-operatively clinical outcomes and oncologic outcomes. A systemic review demonstrated that visceral obesity, especially, is associated with an increased risk of longer hospital stay, higher morbidity, and longer operative time after colon surgery and that obese patients had lower chances of survival and more aggressive biological tumor features.6 However, a study reported that patients with visceral obesity tended to have significantly better overall survival than patients with non-visceral obesity and controversies exist regarding the correlation between visceral obesity and the outcome of colon cancer.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a non-invasive technique that requires a low cost equipment available at many health care services for routine nutritional assessment describes the percentages of fat, protein, minerals in human bodies. Recently, several studies have established a relationship between some parameters of body composition such as skeletal muscle mass index, the index of sarcopenia or phase angle and clinical and oncologic outcomes of CRC.7-9 However, to our knowledge, there were no studies about using BIA to find the effects of visceral fat on outcomes of CRC. Therefore, our study aimed to compare the effects of visceral obesity measuring by bioelectrical impedance analysis using Inbody 770 (Biospace, Seoul, Korea) on clinical and pathologic outcomes to patients who was treated with surgery for CRC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study group included 204 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal adenocarcinoma between January 2016 and June 2020. The patients were divided into low and high groups according to visceral fat area (VFA) measured by BIA. The exclusion criteria included synchronous or previous malignancies, malignancies other than adenocarcinoma, and familial adenomatous polyposis or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Dongsan Medical Center, and informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Data on patient demographics, including age, sex, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, body mass index (BMI), and location of the tumor, platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-neutrophil index (PNI) were collected retrospectively. Perioperative outcomes included operation time, time to gas out, sips of water, and soft diet, hospital stay, morbidity within 30 days and Clavien-Dindo classification. Pathologic outcomes included tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage, histology, number of harvested lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes, metastatic lymph node ratio, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and extranodal tumor deposits.
BIA was performed using Inbody 770 (Biospace) to estimate patient’s body composition at their first visit. Among various parameters of BIA, we categorized variables as body composition and metabolic index, fat index, muscle index, obesity index, and phase angle. We used the average value of the VFA as the cut-off level, because there have been no previous studies on the cut-off value for VFA using BIA. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was calulated using Baumgartner’s definition (appendicular skeletal muscle mass/height2).
All of the patients underwent preoperative evaluation including colonoscopy, computed tomography scan of chest and abdomen, and magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis. Some patients underwent positron emission tomography scans for check distant metastasis. We followed the general principles of complete mesocolic or mesorectal excision and central vascular ligation for CRC. The primary tumor was resected by sharp dissection of the visceral plane from the parietal fascia layer along with the entire regional mesocolon in an intact package. For right-sided colon cancer, radical lymphadenectomy including D2 or D3 dissection along the primary feeding vessels along a vertical line to expose the superior mesenteric vein was performed. For left-sided colon or rectal cancer, high ligation or selectively low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with lymph node dissection according to the tumor location was performed. Tumor stages were classified in accordance with the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition staging system.
The results are presented as medians with ranges for continuous outcomes and as frequencies with percentages for categorical outcomes. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Continuous variables were analyzed with independent t-test and Mann-Whitney test. A P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
RESULTS
According to the average value of VFA, 119 (58.3%) patients had low VFA and 85 (59.1%) patients had high VFA. Patients’ characteristics which were divided into amount of visceral fat are summarized in Table 1. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and C-reactive protein tended to higher in non-visceral obesity (8.0±23.2 vs. 3.4±4.8, P=0.073 and 0.74±1.6 vs. 0.35±0.5, P=0.060, respectively). Patients with high VFA showed significantly higher BMI than patients with low VFA (21.8±1.9 vs. 25.7±2.5, P<0.001). All inflammation indexes including PLR, NLR, PNI had no statistical differences between two groups.
Table 2 showed no significant difference in the overall perioperative outcomes including total operation time, time to gas out, sips of water, soft diet, and hospital stay between patients with low and high VFA groups. Also, there were no significant difference in morbidity within 30 days after surgery, the proportion of Clavien-Dindo classification >3a, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Comparing to non-visceral obesity, there were no significant difference in overall TNM stage, differentiation, the number of total lymph node harvested and pathologically positive lymph node, tumor side, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and extranodal tumor deposit between two groups, except there were more lymphovascular invasion in patients with low VFA (33.6% vs. 16.5%, P= 0.008) (Table 3).
To investigate the impact of VFA in nodal disease, we divided into two subgroups including stage one and two CRC and stage three and four CRC. In earlier CRC, there were no significant difference in tumor stage and patients with low FVA showed more poorly differentiated tumor histology (6.4% vs. 1.8%, P=0.050). The mean number of total and positive retrieved lymph nodes, the proportion of more than 12 lymph nodes harvested, and perineural invasion were not significantly different, however low VFA group had more lymphovascular invasion than high VFA group (24.4% vs. 5.5%, P=0.005).
In more advanced CRC, patients with low VFA showed significantly more total and positive retrieved lymph nodes (20.9±10.3 vs. 16.1±7.1, P=0.021 and 3.3±2.9 vs. 2.2±2.3, P=0.019, respectively) and higher proportion of more than 12 retrieved lymph nodes compared to patients with high VFA (95.1% vs. 90.0%, P=0.047). Tumor sizes, lymphovascular invasion, metastatic lymph nodes ratio, perineural invasion, and extranodal tumor deposits were not significantly different between two groups.
Table 4 showed the body composition analysis of patients between non-visceral obesity and visceral obesity patients using Inbody 770. Patients with high VFA had higher weight compared to patients with low VFA. Phase angle, muscle compositions including skeletal muscle mass, appendiceal skeletal muscle mass and SMI were not statistically different between two groups. Body fluid, intracellular fluid composition, and extracellular fluid composition showed no significant differences between two groups, however body fat mass was statistically higher in high VFA group (22.0±4.6 vs. 12.8±3.1, P<0.001).
DISCUSSION
In this study, we investigated the surgical outcomes and short-term oncologic outcomes for viscerally obese patients with CRC. To our knowledge, this study is the first report to evaluate the effects of visceral obesity on CRC using BIA. The present study shows that among CRC patients, VFA measured by BIA was not associated with peri-operative outcomes, inflammatory and nutritional, and pathologic outcomes after colorectal surgery. However, patients with low VFA showed more total and positive retrieved lymph nodes and the proportion of more than 12 retrieved lymph nodes compared to patients with high VFA.
Traditionally, body fat composition The WHO BMI definition of obesity ≥30 kg/m2 was adopted, but we also included studies in which BMI was defined as ≥25 kg/m2 for Asian populations. Visceral fat tissue has been acknowledged to be more pathogenic than BMI and visceral adipose tissue could be quantified by computerized tomography, and has been identified as a risk factor for colon cancer.10,11 Compared to subcutaneous adipose tissue, visceral revealed high levels of markers of inflammatory lipid metabolism and some of them associated with cancer stage.10 Gao et al.12 reported that VFA measured by BIA showed satisfactory reliability with that measured by CT and suggested specific cut-off value for VFA by BIA in diagnosing visceral obesity for patients with gastric cancer in the Chinese population. Our study showed positive relationships between BMI and body fat mass and visceral fat have positive relationships. We think that VFA measured by BIA can be an index as surrogates of visceral obesity, although we could not compare the accuracy of BIA in estimating VFA with other index such as BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, or VFA measured by CT scan.
Some studies showed that obese patients have a significant risk of overall postoperative complications, surgical site infection, anastomotic leakage and colostomy complications. Kang et al.13 divided into the obese group and the non-obese group who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer according to BMI and VFA measured by abdominal CT and demonstrated that VFA was more reliable predictive indicator than BMI in estimating early surgical outcomes for patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery. Yu et al.14 investigated VFA and general obesity and to compare visceral and general obesity as predictors of surgical outcomes of a CRC resection and described that there was no differences in morbidity, mortality, postoperative bowel recovery, and readmission rate after surgery between the visceral obesity and visceral non-obesity groups. In the current study, visceral obesity has no influence on intraoperative difficulties, postoperative complications, and postoperative recovery in patients with CRC. Prospective studies with more sample-size are needed.
Some studies evaluated the importance of lymph node metastasis in colon cancer and found that visceral obesity was associated with a lower likelihood of metastatic lymph node involvement.15,16 Park et al.17 showed that a larger number of lymph nodes removed in patients without obesity than in patients with BMI=25.0~29.9 kg/m2, but no differences compared with patients with higher BMI (>30.0 kg/m2). A study that evaluated the impact of visceral obesity on lymph node metastasis and overall survival in colon cancer reported that metastatic lymph node ratio was significantly associated only with lower VFA to total fat area ratio.18 Meanwhile, current guidelines for CRC treatment suggest that a minimum 12 lymph nodes need to be examined to establish nodal stage. Those guidelines recommend that less than 12 lymph nodes retrieved constitute the high-risk factors for recurrence and adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial to those patients. In our study, non-visceral obesity patients showed more total and pathological lymph nodes harvested than patients with visceral obesity. We think that surgeon may have more difficulty to perform a radical lymphadenectomy in the excess fat tissue around major vessels in patients with visceral obesity. And identification of lymph nodes were difficult for pathologists.19
A recent study showed that sarcopenia had negatively impact on overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific survival in patients with non- metastatic and metastatic CRC.20 Phase angle that is defined as the ratio of resistance (intracellular and extracellular resistance) to reactance (cell membrane-specific resistance) expressed as an angle and is considered an indicator of cell membrane function. There were few studies about relation phase angle and other gastrointestinal cancers that low phase angle showed bad clinical and pathological outcomes.21,22 We tried to find the association between VFO and other nutritional index measured by BIA such as SMI and phase angle, however there was no statistical relationship between visceral obesity and those parameters.
Some previous studies reported the PLR are associated with fat respectively. Bahadır et al.23 reported that lymphocyte count significantly was higher while increasing BMI and Samocha-Bonet et al.24 found that platelet count had positive relation to BMI only in females. Because female had high body fat mass and excessive adipose tissue was shown to induce systemic and chronic inflammation through the release of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin-6 (IL-6). Yudkin et al.25 have demonstrated an association between obesity and IL-6 levels. IL-6 is inflammatory cytokines that plays a crucial role in increasing platelet count. However, inflammation factors including PLR, PNI, NLR showed no remarkable differences in non-visceral obesity patients to visceral obesity patients in this study.
The limitations of this study include its retrospective design, which is subject to incomplete data and potential selection bias in single institution. Secondly, our study included only small number of patients and didn’t include survival data. Thirdly, the cut-off value of visceral obesity was the average value of the patients included in our study. Further prospective study with receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the cut-off value of visceral obesity measured by BIA is needed. In conclusion, visceral obesity measured by BIA showed lower total and positive retrieved lymph nodes and was no associated with peri-operative outcomes, inflammatory and nutritional, and pathologic outcomes for CRC.
Table 1
Patient characteristics
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). VFA = visceral fat area; CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen; CRP = C-reactive protein; ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI = body mass index; PLR = platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR = neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PNI = prognostic nutritional index.
Table 2
Perioperative clinical outcomes
Table 3
Postoperative pathologic outcomes
Table 4
Inbody 770 body composition analysis of patients
- 1. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. 2008;Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 371(9612):569-78. ArticlePubMed
- 2. Calle EE, Kaaks R. 2004;Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemio-logical evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat Rev Cancer 4(8):579-91. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 3. Murphy TK, Calle EE, Rodriguez C, Kahn HS, Thun MJ. 2000;Body mass index and colon cancer mortality in a large prospective study. Am J Epidemiol 152(9):847-54. ArticlePubMed
- 4. WHO Expert Consultation. 2004;Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and inter-vention strategies. Lancet 363(9403):157-63. ArticlePubMed
- 5. Examination Committee of Criteria for 'Obesity Disease' in Japan; Japan Society for the Study of Obesity. 2002;New criteria for 'obesity disease' in Japan. Circ J 66(11):987-92. ArticlePubMed
- 6. Cakir H, Heus C, van der Ploeg TJ, Houdijk AP. 2015;Visceral obesity determined by CT scan and outcomes after colorectal surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 30(7):875-82. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 7. Song WJ, Kim KE, Bae SU, Jeong WK, Baek SK. 2019;Association between body composition measured by bioelectrical im-pedance analysis and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer. Korean J Clin Oncol 15(1):7-14. Article
- 8. Oh RK, Ko HM, Lee JE, Lee KH, Kim JY, Kim JS. 2020;Clinical impact of sarcopenia in patients with colon cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res 99(3):153-60. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 9. Gupta D, Lis CG, Dahlk SL, King J, Vashi PG, Grutsch JF, et al. 2008;The relationship between bioelectrical impedance phase angle and subjective global assessment in advanced colorectal cancer. Nutr J 7:19.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 10. Liesenfeld DB, Grapov D, Fahrmann JF, Salou M, Scherer D, Toth R, et al. 2015;Metabolomics and transcriptomics identify pathway differences between visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in colorectal cancer patients: the ColoCare study. Am J Clin Nutr 102(2):433-43. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 11. Suzuki S, Goto A, Nakatochi M, Narita A, Yamaji T, Sawada N, et al. 2021;Body mass index and colorectal cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study. Cancer Sci 112(4):1579-88. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 12. Gao B, Liu Y, Ding C, Liu S, Chen X, Bian X. 2020;Comparison of visceral fat area measured by CT and bioelectrical impedance analysis in Chinese patients with gastric cancer: a cross-sec-tional study. BMJ Open 10(7):e036335. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 13. Kang J, Baek SE, Kim T, Hur H, Min BS, Lim JS, et al. 2012;Impact of fat obesity on laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: more reliable indicator than body mass index. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(4):497-505. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 14. Yu H, Joh YG, Son GM, Kim HS, Jo HJ, Kim HY. 2016;Distribution and impact of the visceral fat area in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Coloproctol 32(1):20-6. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 15. Watanabe J, Tatsumi K, Ota M, Suwa Y, Suzuki S, Watanabe A, et al. 2014;The impact of visceral obesity on surgical outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(3):343-51. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 16. Görög D, Nagy P, Péter A, Perner F. 2003;Influence of obesity on lymph node recovery from rectal resection specimens. Pathol Oncol Res 9(3):180-3. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 17. Park JW, Lim SW, Choi HS, Jeong SY, Oh JH, Lim SB. 2010;The impact of obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Asians. Surg Endosc 24(7):1679-85. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 18. Park SW, Lee HL, Doo EY, Lee KN, Jun DW, Lee OY, et al. 2015;Visceral obesity predicts fewer lymph node metastases and better overall survival in colon cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 19(8):1513-21. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 19. Yang T, Wei M, He Y, Deng X, Wang Z. 2015;Impact of visceral obesity on outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 85(7-8):507-13. ArticlePubMed
- 20. Vergara-Fernandez O, Trejo-Avila M, Salgado-Nesme N. 2020;Sarco-penia in patients with colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases 8(7):1188-202. ArticlePubMedPMC
- 21. Yu B, Park KB, Park JY, Lee SS, Kwon OK, Chung HY. 2019;Bioelectrical impedance analysis for prediction of early com-plications after gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer: the phase angle measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. J Gastric Cancer 19(3):278-89. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 22. Hui D, Moore J, Park M, Liu D, Bruera E. 2019;Phase angle and the diagnosis of impending death in patients with advanced cancer: preliminary findings. Oncologist 24(6):e365-73. ArticlePubMedPDF
- 23. Bahadir A, Baltaci D, Türker Y, Türker Y, Iliev D, Öztürk S, et al. 2015;Is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio indicative of inflammatory state in patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome? Anatol J Cardiol 15(10):816-22. ArticlePubMed
- 24. Samocha-Bonet D, Justo D, Rogowski O, Saar N, Abu-Abeid S, Shenkerman G, et al. 2008;Platelet counts and platelet activation markers in obese subjects. Mediators Inflamm 2008:834153. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
- 25. Yudkin JS, Stehouwer CD, Emeis JJ, Coppack SW. 1999;C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: associations with obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction: a potential role for cytokines originating from adipose tissue? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19(4):972-8. PubMed
References
Figure & Data
REFERENCES
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by 
Cite
XML DownloadImpact of Visceral Fat Area Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis on Clinico-Pathologic Outcomes of Colorectal Surgery
Impact of Visceral Fat Area Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis on Clinico-Pathologic Outcomes of Colorectal Surgery
Patient characteristics
| Variables | Low VFA (n=119) | High VFA (n=85) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 66.4±9.9 | 65.5±10.1 | 0.544 |
| Sex | 0.053 | ||
| Male | 88 (73.9) | 52 (61.2) | |
| Female | 31 (26.1) | 33 (38.8) | |
| Preoperative CEA (ng/mL) | 8.0±23.2 | 3.4±4.8 | 0.073 |
| Preoperative CRP | 0.74±1.6 | 0.35±0.5 | 0.060 |
| ASA score | 0.872 | ||
| I | 34 (28.6) | 25 (29.4) | |
| II | 68 (57.1) | 50 (58.8) | |
| III | 17 (14.3) | 10 (11.8) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.8±1.9 | 25.7±2.5 | <0.001 |
| Location of tumor | 0.256 | ||
| Right-sided | 32 (26.9) | 17 (20.0) | |
| Left-sided | 87 (73.1) | 68 (80.0) | |
| PLR | 181.7±110.7 | 190.7±102.9 | 0.548 |
| NLR | 3.3±3.4 | 3.1±2.6 | 0.700 |
| PNI | 67.0±27.0 | 72.6±32.6 | 0.199 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). VFA = visceral fat area; CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen; CRP = C-reactive protein; ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI = body mass index; PLR = platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR = neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PNI = prognostic nutritional index.
Perioperative clinical outcomes
| Variables | Low VFA (n=119) | High VFA (n=85) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operation time (min) | 204.5±101.0 | 208.6±93.1 | 0.762 |
| Time to gas out (d) | 3.1±2.2 | 2.9±1.6 | 0.293 |
| Time to sips of water (d) | 4.1±3.4 | 3.9±5.0 | 0.687 |
| Time to soft diet (d) | 6.5±3.8 | 6.3±5.1 | 0.805 |
| Length of stay (d) | 10.8±6.5 | 9.6±0.9 | 0.188 |
| Morbidity within 30 days after surgery | 41 (34.4) | 27 (31.8) | 0.688 |
| Clavien-Dindo classifications >3a | 25 (21.0) | 17 (20.0) | 0.861 |
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy | 27 (22.7) | 18 (21.2) | 0.797 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). VFA = visceral fat area.
Postoperative pathologic outcomes
| Pathologic outcomes | All patients | Stage 1 and 2 | Stage 3 and 4 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low VFA (n=119) | High VFA (n=85) | P-value | Low VFA (n=78) | High VFA (n=55) | P-value | Low VFA (n=41) | High VFA (n=30) | P-value | |||
| Tumor stage | 0.369 | 0.701 | 0.056 | ||||||||
| T1 | 27 (22.7) | 25 (29.4) | 24 (30.8) | 20 (36.4) | 1 (2.4) | 5 (16.7) | |||||
| T2 | 21 (17.6) | 18 (21.2) | 19 (24.4) | 14 (25.5) | 4 (9.8) | 4 (13.3) | |||||
| T3 | 60 (50.4) | 39 (45.9) | 35 (44.9) | 21 (38.2) | 26 (63.4) | 19 (63.3) | |||||
| T4 | 11 (9.2) | 3 (3.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (24.4) | 2 (6.7) | |||||
| Nodal stage | 0.417 | 0.140 | |||||||||
| N0 | 79 (66.4) | 54 (63.5) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |||||||
| N1 | 23 (19.3) | 20 (23.5) | 25 (61.0) | 24 (80) | |||||||
| N2 | 17 (14.3) | 11 (12.9) | 16 (39.0) | 6 (20) | |||||||
| Nodal status | |||||||||||
| Negative | 79 (66.4) | 54 (63.5) | 0.673 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0) | 0.389 | |||||
| Positive | 40 (33.6) | 31 (36.5) | 41 (88.0) | 30 (100) | |||||||
| Metastasis 1 | 5 (4.2) | 4 (4.7) | 0.363 | 5 (12.0) | 3 (10.0) | 0.773 | |||||
| Stage | |||||||||||
| I, II | 78 (65.5) | 55 (64.7) | 0.901 | ||||||||
| III, IV | 41 (34.5) | 30 (35.3) | |||||||||
| Histology | 0.061 | 0.050 | 0.656 | ||||||||
| Well differentiated | 12 (9.2) | 4 (2.4) | 11 (14.1) | 2 (3.6) | 1 (2.4) | 2 (6.7) | |||||
| Moderately differentiated | 98 (82.4) | 78 (91.8) | 62 (79.5) | 52 (94.5) | 36 (87.8) | 26 (86.7) | |||||
| Poorly differentiated | 9 (7.6) | 3 (3.5) | 5 (6.4) | 1 (1.8) | 4 (9.8) | 2 (6.7) | |||||
| Retrieved LNs | 19.7±9.6 | 17.2±8.7 | 0.064 | 19.0±9.2 | 17.9±9.4 | 0.654 | 20.9±10.3 | 16.1±7.1 | 0.021 | ||
| Retrieved LNs | 0.074 | 0.394 | 0.047 | ||||||||
| ≥12 | 107 (89.9) | 69 (81.2) | 68 (87.2) | 45 (81.8) | 39 (95.1) | 24 (90.0) | |||||
| <12 | 12 (10.1) | 16 (18.5) | 10 (12.8) | 10 (18.2) | 2 (4.9) | 6 (10.0) | |||||
| Positive LNs | 1.1±2.3 | 0.8±1.7 | 0.233 | 3.3±2.9 | 2.2±2.3 | 0.019 | |||||
| Tumor size (cm) | 3.8±2.1 | 3.4±2.2 | 0.174 | 3.4±2.2 | 3.1±2.1 | 0.324 | 4.4±1.7 | 3.9±2.4 | 0.288 | ||
| Lymphovascular invasion | 40 (33.6) | 14 (16.5) | 0.008 | 19 (24.4) | 3 (5.5) | 0.005 | 21 (51.2) | 11 (36.7) | 0.223 | ||
| MLR (%) | 6.2±11.9 | 5.0±9.8 | 0.441 | 17.6±14.4 | 14.1±12.0 | 0.268 | |||||
| Perineural invasion | 25 (21.0) | 16 (18.8) | 0.746 | 2 (2.6) | 4 (7.3) | 0.183 | 23 (56.1) | 12 (40) | 0.180 | ||
| Extranodal tumor deposit | 24 (40.7) | 13 (36.1) | 0.389 | 24 (64.9) | 13 (52.0) | 0.311 | |||||
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).
VFA = visceral fat area; LN = lymph node; MLR = metastatic lymph nodes ratio.
Inbody 770 body composition analysis of patients
| Body analysis | Low VFA (n=119) | High VFA (n=85) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height (cm) | 162.3±8.8 | 162.4±9.6 | 0.969 |
| Weight (kg) | 57.8±8.6 | 68.1±11.3 | <0.001 |
| Phase angle (°) | 5.1±0.7 | 5.0±0.7 | 0.658 |
| Skeletal muscle mass (kg) | 24.5±4.7 | 25.2±5.6 | 0.363 |
| ASM (kg) | 18.5±3.8 | 19.1±4.1 | 0.266 |
| Skeletal muscle index (kg/m2) | 7.0±1.1 | 7.2±1.0 | 0.156 |
| Body fluid (%) | 33.2±5.7 | 68.1±6.8 | 0.352 |
| ICF (%) | 20.3±3.6 | 20.8±4.3 | 0.368 |
| ECF (%) | 12.9±2.1 | 13.2±2.6 | 0.329 |
| Body fat mass (kg) | 12.8±3.1 | 22.0±4.6 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
VFA = visceral fat area; ASM = appendicular skeletal muscle mass; ICF = intracellular fluid; ECF = extracellular fluid.
Table 1
Patient characteristics
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). VFA = visceral fat area; CEA = carcinoembryonic antigen; CRP = C-reactive protein; ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; BMI = body mass index; PLR = platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; NLR = neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PNI = prognostic nutritional index.
Table 2
Perioperative clinical outcomes
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). VFA = visceral fat area.
Table 3
Postoperative pathologic outcomes
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%). VFA = visceral fat area; LN = lymph node; MLR = metastatic lymph nodes ratio.
Table 4
Inbody 770 body composition analysis of patients
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. VFA = visceral fat area; ASM = appendicular skeletal muscle mass; ICF = intracellular fluid; ECF = extracellular fluid.
