Malnutrition affects the clinical outcomes of pancreatic disease. On the other hand, the changes in the nutritional status stratified by malignant and non-malignant diseases after surgery still need to be determined. The aim was to confirm the changing nutritional status and clinical outcomes after a pancreatoduodenectomy according to malignant and non-malignant disease.
Data were collected prospectively from 157 patients between 2009 and 2015. The nutritional status was classified as well-nourished, at-risk of malnutrition, and malnourished by a Mini Nutrition Assessment. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the postoperative complication, hospital stay, biochemical nutritional markers, and quality-of-life (QOL).
Preoperatively, the proportion of malnourished status in the malignant disease group (group B) were 66.7% and 33.3% in the non-malignancy group (group A). The malnutrition rate in group B was higher than that in group A at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery (58.1% vs. 41.9%, 90.0% vs. 10.0, 77.8% vs. 22.2%, respectively). The preoperative QOL was significantly lower in group B than in group A (P<.001); however, the QOL was comparable between the two groups after surgery. The body mass index was unrecovered after surgery in all groups.
Patients with malignant pancreatic disease are more likely to suffer from a poor nutritional status than those with non-malignant pancreatic disease. One year after the pancreatoduodenctomy, the at-risk of malnutrition and malnourished rate were found to be over 70% in all patients. Therefore, more efforts will be needed to improve the nutritional status in pancreatic head disease.
Enteral feeding is strongly recommended for critically ill patients since it can enhance the immunologic function, which serves as a host defense mechanism against inflammation or metabolic response to stress. Herein, we investigated nutritional status and estimated the adequacy of the nutritional supply for acutely ill patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after a major operation.
From February to October 2016, patients admitted and stayed over 48 hours after major surgical procedures at SICU in Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital were reviewed. The nutritional parameters and surgical outcomes were compared according to the status of nutritional support.
A total of 220 patients composed of 130 males (59.1%) and 90 females (40.9%) were enrolled, and mean age was 61.4±13.6 years. All patients were classified into two groups according to nutritional status, which was assessed by the ratio of total delivered calories to total required calories (D/R); group A (54 cases, 24.5%, D/R≥0.7) versus group B (166 cases, 75.5%, D/R<0.7). In multivariate analysis, incision in the lower abdomen (Odds Ratio 2.277, P=0.078), absence of NST consultation (Odds Ratio 2.728, P=0.011), and not receive minimal invasive surgery (Odds Ratio 3.518, P=0.001) were independent risk factors associated with poor nutritional status.
Clinicians should pay more attention to patients who had an incision in the lower abdomen or did not receive minimal invasive surgery or NST consultation, which would be predisposing factors for nutritional insufficiency resulting in postoperative morbidities.