Citations
Citations
Patients with cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract can suffer from nutritional inadequacies caused by various factors. This study investigated the risk of malnutrition after curative surgery in patients with gastric cancer (GC) or colorectal cancer (CRC) using various preoperative and postoperative nutritional screening tools.
In the authors’ hospital, 407 patients (206 patients with GC and 201 patients with CRC) underwent surgery between July 2011 and June 2012. The patients from the two groups were matched using the propensity score and then analyzed the nutritional data from 170 patients (85 patients in each group), retrospectively.
In both groups, the postoperative nutritional status was impaired significantly compared to the preoperative status. The postoperative risk of undernutrition in CRC patients was significantly lower than that of the GC patients according to the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (P=0.007). At the time of hospital discharge after surgery, the incidence of a lower serum albumin level (P=0.002) and more than 5% weight loss (P=0.013) were higher in the GC group than in the CRC group. A comparison of the postoperative nutritional status among the types of surgery in each group, total gastrectomy in the GC group (P=0.015) and proctectomy with diverting stoma in the CRC group (P=0.06), were related to more than 5% weight loss.
Gastrointestinal cancer surgery might increase the patients’ postoperative risk of malnutrition, particularly in GC surgery. Therefore, consecutive assessments of the nutritional status and appropriate nutritional support are necessary after surgery for GC and CRC.
Citations
Postoperative early enteral nutrition or early oral ingestion is recommended in surgical patients. In this situation, this study examined the role of parenteral nutrition in the postoperative period in patients undergoing elective surgery. The nutritional status should be assessed before surgery and in the case of malnutrition, nutritional support should be provided before surgery to obtain good results. More than 2 weeks of insufficient nutritional support after surgery may worsen the patient’s progress. Therefore, it is recommended to start nutritional care if the oral intake is not appropriate until 7 days or 5 to 7 days after surgery. Enteral nutrition is related to the quick restoration of the bowel function and reduction of infection-related complications. Therefore, enteral nutrition has priority. On the other hand, depending on the patient’s condition, it may not be possible to perform enteral nutrition, and the uniform implementation of the early enteral nutrition may be a burden to the patient. Parenteral nutrition has the advantage that it can supply nutrition without being affected by the intestinal condition, and it can be calculated to supply as much energy as required. The situation, where parenteral nutrition is required after elective surgery, could be summarized as 1) the patients who underwent nutritional therapy before surgery and could not tolerate oral intake or enteral nutrition after surgery. or 2) in the case where enteral nutrition did not satisfy 50% of the demand at 7 days after surgery, and it is judged that this situation should continue for 7 days.
Enteral feeding is strongly recommended for critically ill patients since it can enhance the immunologic function, which serves as a host defense mechanism against inflammation or metabolic response to stress. Herein, we investigated nutritional status and estimated the adequacy of the nutritional supply for acutely ill patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after a major operation.
From February to October 2016, patients admitted and stayed over 48 hours after major surgical procedures at SICU in Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital were reviewed. The nutritional parameters and surgical outcomes were compared according to the status of nutritional support.
A total of 220 patients composed of 130 males (59.1%) and 90 females (40.9%) were enrolled, and mean age was 61.4±13.6 years. All patients were classified into two groups according to nutritional status, which was assessed by the ratio of total delivered calories to total required calories (D/R); group A (54 cases, 24.5%, D/R≥0.7) versus group B (166 cases, 75.5%, D/R<0.7). In multivariate analysis, incision in the lower abdomen (Odds Ratio 2.277, P=0.078), absence of NST consultation (Odds Ratio 2.728, P=0.011), and not receive minimal invasive surgery (Odds Ratio 3.518, P=0.001) were independent risk factors associated with poor nutritional status.
Clinicians should pay more attention to patients who had an incision in the lower abdomen or did not receive minimal invasive surgery or NST consultation, which would be predisposing factors for nutritional insufficiency resulting in postoperative morbidities.
Citations
Deteriorated nutritional status is common during a hospital stay for esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer. Malnutrition in those patients is often marked compared with other gastrointestinal cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the appropriateness of commercial peripheral parenteral nutrition (CPPN) use in patients who underwent Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (I-L op).
Patients who were provided with CPPN after I-L op were enrolled in this study from January to May 2015. Body weight, height, nutritional status, length of hospital stay, duration of CPPN therapy, and parenteral nutrition (PN) induced complications were assessed, respectively, using electronic medical records.
Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Average age was 65.9 years and 36 patients were male. All patients were provided with the same CPPN. The duration of fasting and CPPN use was 5.8±1.4 days and 7.5±1.8 days, respectively. Calorie supported by CPPN was 22.6±3.5 kcal/kg/day and only 20.5% of patients (n=8) reached the daily target calories. Most frequent PN induced complication was phlebitis which occurred in 8 patients (20.5%). Calcium, magnesium, and transthyretin levels in serum were not monitored during the PN support period.
The indications for CPPN were appropriate because the fasting duration in patients with I-L op was 5 to 10 days. Although a large portion of patients could not be supplied daily target calories, their nutrition status was not significantly changed on admission and at discharge. We did not find it necessary to individualize PN support for a short period after an I-L op in patients with esophageal cancer. Further study will be needed to determine why the incidence of phlebitis was dominant.