A questionnaire survey was conducted using e-mail to investigate the application status of ERAS in Korea and its implementation by their institution. The perceptions of ERAS by medical staff and the factors that interfered with the application of ERAS were investigated.
From July 2017 to March 2019, a questionnaire was sent by e-mail to members of the KSSMN. This consisted of 41 questions divided into three parts to investigate 1) respondents’ prior knowledge and understanding of ERAS, 2) actual components of ERAS and its clinical application, and 3) performance and preference of the respondents to ERAS. The items were categorized into “high acceptance” when more than 75% of respondents answered “yes”, or the items into “low acceptance” when less than 25% answered “no”.
Overall, 86 participants completed the survey. Of these, 59(68.6%) had prior knowledge of ERAS and 29 (33.7%) applied ERAS clinically. Seventy (81.4%) and 40 (46.5%) answered that ERAS would have a positive effect on shortening the hospital stay and reducing the number of complications. Seventy four (86%) indicated that they would implement ERAS in the future. The factors impeding the implementation of ERAS were a lack of understanding of physicians and a shortage of manpower and resources for ERAS.
The ERAS implementation rate and awareness level of surgeons were low, but the positive expectations of the clinical efficacy of ERAS and the wiliness to accept were high. Overall, it would be necessary to cooperate with institutions to improve the manpower and resources, and supplement the education to overcome the lack of awareness, which has been pointed out as an obstacle to the implementation of ERAS.
Sarcopenia refers to reduced muscle mass in the elderly population, and this malady is of great interest in clinical course, including postoperative complications and mortality when treating major cancer in the elderly. The definition of sarcopenia varies according to the method of measuring muscle mass, and the skeletal muscle index (SMI) tends to be extensively used in retrospective studies. In many reports, sarcopenia has been reported to be a poor prognostic factor after gastrectomy, colectomy, pancreatectomy and liver transplantation, with regards to complications and the length of the hospital stay. Additionally, patients suffering from sarcopenia have a higher medical burden due to their poor clinical outcome after surgery. To overcome these difficulties, nutritional support and exercise training to improve sarcopenia before surgery is helpful, and so further studies that focus on these treatments need to be conducted.
Patients in prolonged intensive care unit stay were vulnerable to malnutrition which deteriorated recovery and postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate nutritional status in surgical patients entering the intensive care unit, and to identify the risk factors that influence prolonged intensive care unit stay.
From January 2016 to June 2018, 740 patients (age≥18 years) who were admitted to our surgical intensive care unit after abdominal surgery with general anesthesia (≥4 hours) were enrolled. Patients were classified into short-term stay group (≤4 days) and long-term stay group (>4 days). These groups were analyzed and compared with patient factors and postoperative outcomes and the multivariate analysis was performed to assess the risk factors for prolonged intensive care unit stay.
A total of 119 patients were analyzed. The univariate and multivariate analysis showed that dialysis status (Odds ratio 7.684, 95% confidence interval 1.038∼1.103, P=0.013), total lymphocyte count (Odds ratio 0.999, 95% confidence interval 0.998∼1.000, P=0.047), and intraoperative transfusion (Odds ratio 1.002, 95% confidence interval 1.001∼1.002, P=0.000) were associated with prolonged intensive care unit stay. Lone-term stay group were significantly longer hospital stay and higher hospital morbidity rate than short-term stay group.
Patients with risk factors of prolonged intensive care unit stay included dialysis status, low total lymphocyte count, a large amount of transfusion would be more interested and the active intervention such as early nutritional evaluation and adequate nutritional support should be needed.
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a hospital-acquired infection (HAI) associated with increased mortality, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization. The aim of this study was to identify the value of albumin as an indicator of the nutritional status, postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell (WBC) levels in predicting an outbreak of SSI and SSI-related epidemiology after colorectal surgery and identifying the risk factors for SSI.
A total of 198 patients, who underwent colorectal surgery from September 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016, were included in the study. The patient identity, operation characteristics, and SSI data were analyzed retrospectively by a chart review and national SSI reporting sheet. The relationship of the SSI and clinical data was analyzed statistically, and the SSI detection time and post-operative inflammatory laboratory findings were analyzed individually using cumulative incidence analysis and cause-specific hazard model.
The incidence of SSI post colorectal surgery was 15.7% (31 out of 198 cases). Chronic renal failure (CRF), open surgery, long operation time, and stoma were identified as significant risk factors for SSI using univariate analysis. The CRF, long operation time, and stoma were significant risk factors according to multivariate analysis. The decrease in albumin on post-operative day (POD)#3 and CRP elevation on POD#4 were related to the early detection of SSI.
The actual incidence of SSI might be higher than expected, particularly in cases where patients have several clinical and operative factors. In addition, the albumin level and multiple postoperative inflammation tests can be employed as an early predictors of SSI.
Bariatric surgery is considered one of the most effective methods of achieving long-term weight loss in morbidly obese patients. Nevertheless, bariatric procedures are associated with a number of complications, and nutrient deficiencies can lead to deleterious consequences. Furthermore, the diet of patients prior to bariatric surgery is often of poor nutrition quality that does not meet the recommended dietary guidelines for micronutrient intake. Therefore, optimization of the postoperative nutritional status should begin before surgery. This review covers the essential information about micronutrient management in patients before and after bariatric surgery.
Paradoxically, the obese are more susceptible to malnutrition. The more obese they are, the greater the risk for micronutrient deficiencies particularly in fat-soluble vitamins and anti-oxidants. Several micronutrient deficiencies could be worsened because of poor intake and absorption difficulty after bariatric surgery. Micronutrient deficiencies could not only decrease the effect of bariatric surgery but also cause various diseases such as anemia, neurologic impairment, or osteoporosis. Micronutrient deficiencies should be monitored, recognized, and corrected properly in bariatric patients in order to maximize the effect of surgery and improve the health-related quality of life.
In surgical procedures under general anesthesia, 6 to 8 hours of a
A group of 30 adult patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia were enrolled. The enrolled study group of patients was permitted to drink a carbohydrate-rich solution until two hours before the operation without volume limitation. Respiratory complication was investigated in the patients using the carbohydrate-rich solution until two hours before induction of general anesthesia. The feelings of thirst, hunger sense were measured pre- and post-operatively. In addition, hoarseness of voice, nausea and vomiting were investigated post-operatively. Satisfaction regarding the short time of fasting was measured. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for measurement of these six variables.
No patients showed serious respiratory complication such as dyspnea, desaturation. Eight of 30 study group patients complained of mild hoarseness. Most symptoms of hoarseness were mild, with VAS score less than 3 out of 10. Two patients complained 5 out of 10. Six patients felt nausea and 1 patient had vomiting. Pre/post-operative hunger sense and thirst feeling were 1.63/1.60 and 1.90/5.76, respectively. The satisfaction score was 3.00 out of 4.
Allowing the administration of an oral carbohydrate-rich solution in elective surgery patients requiring general anesthesia is safe without serious respiratory complications and effective in providing satisfaction.
The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes in patients who underwent laparoscopic assisted low anterior resection for colorectal cancer. The patients received either conventional perioperative care or the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) procedural care.
A retrospective review was conducted in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic low anterior resection for colorectal cancer between May, 2011 and December, 2013. Patients were grouped and analyzed according to the perioperative care program of ERAS and conventional care.
A total of 81 patients received care via the ERAS pathway and 230 patients received care via conventional pathway. There was no significant difference in postoperative morbidity rates (P=0.381). The post-operative morbidity rates were 30.9% and 25.2% in the ERAS and conventional groups. No significant difference in hospital stay (9.0±6.8 vs. 8.6±3.5 days; P=0.575) was observed between the 2 groups.
No short-term perioperative disadvantages were found for the ERAS program compared with the conventional perioperative care for colorectal cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection. (Surg Metab Nutr 2015;6:11-15)